Practice Perfect - PRESENT Podiatry
Practice Perfect
top title divider

Stop Routine Preoperative Testing

lower title divider
Jarrod Shapiro
many test tubes in racks labeled for various tests

When you have an otherwise healthy patient on whom you’re about to do surgery, what is your laboratory and imaging protocol? Do you do a full battery of labs? Do you order a standard complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel including bleeding labs, electrocardiogram, and chest radiograph? If you do, then I have an alternative paradigm for you.

When I started school, I was taught to order the full battery of labs and imaging on patients regardless of their health status.

“What if you missed the coagulation disorder?” I was asked.
“What if they have anemia, and you didn’t know it?”
“What if they have pneumonia or congestive heart failure?” I was admonished.

In the past, it was incredibly common to see large batteries of tests ordered preoperatively for patients regardless of disease state. But, the times, my friends, they have changed.


In regard to pre-operative testing, the times, my friends, have changed.


The Ridiculous

Those of you who might be prone to doing things the old way may argue preoperative battery testing provides medicolegal protection and screens for previously unknown (occult) disease, protecting both the patient and the doctor. The medicolegal argument is ridiculous. First, don’t practice in fear of being sued – it’s going to happen to you doctors, especially if you’re a surgeon. Don’t want to be sued? Stop practicing. Second, remember that as the ordering physician, you are required to treat or explain the lack of significance of every abnormal value that results from your testing. For podiatrists, that is likely to add a significant number of pointless referrals back to primary care physicians. I’m sure they’ll just love treating that otherwise normal but slightly low white blood cell count.

If you take the screening argument to its extreme, it becomes ridiculous. How many diseases do you plan to screen anyway? Should we add on an electrocardiogram and echocardiogram just in case an otherwise healthy patient has a left bundle branch block or a valve problem? How about an antinuclear antibody test to make sure they don’t have lupus? Or maybe a cosyntropin stim test to check for that oh so common random hypothalamic pituitary axis suppression? I know it’s ridiculous, but you get my point.

What Does the Research Say?

So then what does the research say about routine lab testing for preoperative evaluation?

The current more appropriate paradigm is to order only the labs and imaging based on the preoperative history and physical findings.


Order only the labs and imaging based on the preoperative history and physical findings.


There are volumes of research on this topic, so I’ll keep it brief and provide some evidence to support this paradigm. Here’s an example of how this method differs from the past. In the chart below, you’ll see a patient and the laboratory and imaging tests that would be ordered today versus the past.

Patient H&P Findings
26-year-old female pending bunionectomy with hypothyroidism (taking levothyroxine). Rest of the history and general physical exam are normal except for a slightly enlarged thyroid without palpable nodules.
Prior Preoperative Orders
  • CBC
  • Comprehensive Metabolic Panel
  • TSH, T3, T4
  • Pregnancy testing
  • Chest radiograph
Current Preoperative Orders
  • TSH (thyroid function)
  • Pregnancy testing.

Quite a difference, huh? The comprehensive metabolic panel includes 14 tests and the CBC includes seven values, which makes the difference 24 total tests more than necessary if using the prior method. Clearly, that’s going to be a major cost difference.

Cost vs Good Medical Care

Let’s not worry about the costs. Instead we’ll focus purely on the medical aspect. Since there are too many individual studies for us to discuss, let’s focus on systematic reviews and meta-analyses to cover the largest number of studies and highest quality research.

Balk and colleagues performed a systematic review in January 2014 of perioperative testing for cataract surgeries using sedation or general anesthesia. Their search found 57 quality comparative or cohort studies looking at mortality, perioperative events, patient satisfaction, and harms related to testing. They found routine testing with ECG, basic metabolic panel, or complete blood count did not affect surgery cancellations or total complications.1

Dual Residency Education Summit Ads

Want to order chest radiographs (CXR) for your asymptomatic patients? A Canadian systematic review (including 14 studies out of 513 that met criteria) found no association between CXR and decreased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in any age group (even those above 70 years-old). This review recommended only obtaining CXR for those patients with risk factors.2

Finally, a large-scale important United Kingdom systematic review from back in 1997 found the following results in otherwise healthy patients undergoing routine screening tests:3

Chest X-ray: Results are reported as abnormal in 2.5 – 37.0% of cases with a change in management in 0-2.1% of patients.

Electrocardiography (ECG): Abnormal in 4.6 – 31.7% of cases with a change in management in 0-2.2% of patients with weak predictive power for cardiac complications in noncardiac surgery.

CBC values: Hemoglobin counts are abnormally low in up to 5% of patients and was rarely lower than 9 g/dl with a change in management in 0.1 – 2.7% of patients. Platelet counts are abnormally low in less than 1.1% of patients and almost never lead to a change in care. White blood cell counts were abnormal in less than 1% of patients and almost never lead to a change in care.

Biochemistry: Sodium or potassium were abnormal in up to 1.4% of patients. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or creatinine were abnormal in 2.5% of patients. Glucose was abnormal in 5.2% of patients. These abnormalities did not lead to changes in care.

Urinalysis: Only lead to changes in treatment if WBCs were found (0.1 – 2.8% of patients).

These studies and many others demonstrate clearly that “routine” preoperative testing in otherwise healthy patients rarely changes treatment. Rely on your comprehensive history and physical examination to determine risk factors for your patients and rationally order testing in those patients when necessary.


“Routine” preoperative testing in otherwise healthy patients rarely changes treatment


Best wishes.
Jarrod Shapiro Signature
Jarrod Shapiro, DPM
PRESENT Practice Perfect Editor
[email protected]
article bottom border
References
  1. Balk EM, Earley A, Hadar N, Shah N, Trikalinos TA. Benefits and Harms of Routine Preoperative Testing: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Jan. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 130.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK184821/.
     
  2. Joo HS, Wong J, Naik VN, Savoldelli GL. The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(6):568-574.
     
  3. Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(12):i-iv;1-62.
lower title divider
Get a steady stream of all the NEW PRESENT Podiatry eLearning by becoming our Facebook Fan. Effective eLearning and a Colleague Network await you.

This ezine was made possible through the support of our sponsors:

Grand Sponsor


Major Sponsor