Practice Perfect - PRESENT Podiatry
Practice Perfect
top title divider

Should Podiatry Schools Change to Pass/Fail?

lower title divider
Jarrod Shapiro
report cards

As a teacher at a podiatry school and also a program director at a residency, I’m acutely aware of the two sides of a very challenging coin. On one side are the students. Medical school is very stressful, and any way to decrease the anxiety and allow students to focus on actually learning – such as changing grading to pass/fail – may be an improvement. On the other side of that coin, I run a residency and am looking for the best way to evaluate applicant quality and their likelihood to be successful residents at my program. Often grades, for a variety of reasons, do not help with that picture. For example, a high grade at one school might not translate to the same grade at another college. The two sides of this coin make for a highly unsatisfactory podiatric student environment, one that has an opportunity for improvement.

The question we're going to look at here is “Does a pass/fail grading system in medical school improve students’ well-being and academic outcomes in comparison with a tiered grading method?”

Get a steady stream of all the NEW PRESENT Podiatry eLearning by becoming our Facebook Fan. Effective eLearning and a Colleague Network await you.

I hadn’t previously researched this topic, and I’m going to attempt to reduce the risk of confirmation bias (finding evidence that supports an already-held belief) by being as prospective in my research as possible. To that end, I’ve provided below a running list of the studies I found during my research. For each study I listed the methods, results, and conclusions. By no means is this a systematic review (that’s beyond the capabilities of this editorial format) so feel free to take my analysis with a grain of salt. For those of you desiring the detail behind the rest of this discussion see the references list below. For the rest of you, let’s move on to discuss the themes pulled from these studies.

According to the results of these studies, several conclusions may be drawn when schools change from a graded system with three or more levels (usually either pass/fail/honors or A-F scale for most of the schools studied) to a simpler pass/fail grading system.

When medical schools switch from grades to pass/fail...

  1. Medical students experience significantly less stress. 
  2. Academic performance (GPA, board examinations, clinical scores, residency placement) is not adversely affected.  
  3. Stress is noted to increase with the addition of “honors” to a pass/fail system. 
  4. There is a possible increased risk of borderline students being missed due to the less detailed grading.  

“I vote ‘yay’ to change our schools to pass/fail and the boards to percentile grades”


There are a few things for us in the podiatry community to consider about this research. First, all the studies looked at medical and not podiatric students which challenges the generalizability of these studies to podiatry. Second, there are exactly zero studies on this potential change for podiatric medical students. Third, board examinations for medical students are graded whereas the podiatric version is pass/fail.

Based on my research, I recommend with confidence the following changes to our podiatric education community.

  1. All podiatric medical schools should convert to a pass/fail grading system.  
  2. Our national board examinations should convert to a graded system with listed percentiles on the grade report. They can still state “pass/fail” but would also list a percentile score.  

The benefits to these changes appear pretty obvious. Our students would experience less stress and may also be able to focus a bit more time on other personal development activities such as extracurricular involvement. There’s a chance that performance may actually improve since the decreased stress may allow for better study focus.

A pass/fail system would also benefit our students in terms of residency applications. Much of the subjectivity and potential grade inflation would be eliminated while allowing residencies to use a standardized national examination that all students take at the same time as a comparison of academic skills. As it stands right now, grades and board examination scores tell us very little about how residency applicants compare to each other. One school’s 3.0 GPA is another school’s 2.5. As a program director, I’m forced to disregard these characteristics to a large degree and use additional factors such as class rank to determine what a particular GPA means within each school.

Of course, it’s clear that the recommended changes above must occur simultaneously. We can’t change to a pass/fail college grading and leave the board exam as pass/fail for the same reasons stated above.

In this aspect, the podiatry community is lagging far behind much of the allopathic medical community in which some of the best medical schools in the world, such as the University of California San Francisco, converted years ago to pass/fail grading. If it’s good enough for our MD colleagues, why is it not sufficient for the podiatry community? I vote “yay” to change our schools to pass/fail and the boards to percentile grades, and I vote to make that change immediately for the good of the students and our profession.

Best Wishes.
Jarrod Shapiro Signature
Jarrod Shapiro, DPM
PRESENT Practice Perfect Editor
[email protected]
article bottom border
References
Spring L, Robillard D, Gehlbach L, Simas TA. Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students’ well-being and academic outcomes. Med Ed. 2011 Sep;45:867-877.
Follow this link
Methods: Systematic review of four databases using dates between 1/1980 – 8/2010. Included studies assessed both subjective and objective measures of student well-being and academic outcomes.
Results: Four papers were included studying both well-being and academic outcomes. Five other papers that looked only at academic outcomes were also included. Improvements were noted in student stress and anxiety with a pass-fail format. None of the studies found differences in academic performance between the two grading types.
Conclusions: “Well-being is enhanced and objective academic performance is not adversely affected by a pass/fail evaluation system.”
Carmel H and Amini F. Comparison of the Performance of Psychiatric Residents From Pass/Fail Versus Graded Medical Schools. J Med Educ. 1979 Nov;54:901-902.
Follow this link
Methods: Retrospective review of the entering classes to the Psychiatry residency at UCSF between 1970 and 1975. Examiners looked at 25 characteristics that were graded as part of the regular resident evaluative process with an A – D scale applied. Sixty-seven evaluations out of 71 residents were available for review. Of these charts 40 residents had graduated from graded medical schools and 27 from pass-fail schools.
Results: There were no differences in evaluation scores of residents between those from pass-fail or graded schools.
Conclusions: “Graduation from a graded medical school need not be a dominant consideration.”
Vosti KL, Jacobs CD. Outcome Measurement in Postgraduate Year One of Graduates from a Medical School with a Pass/Fail Grading System. Acad Med. 1999;74(5):547-549.
Follow this link
Methods: A survey was sent to residency directors to evaluate graduates of Stanford University School of Medicine’s classes of 1993 and 1994. Of 169 surveys sent, 144 were returned. Six cognitive and four non-cognitive skills were evaluated on the survey. The questions also asked to compare the Stanford graduated PGY-1 residents with their peer groups from other colleges.
Results: Directors rated the graduates’ overall clinical competencies as “superior” (76%), “good” (22%), and “unsatisfactory” (2%). When compared with their peers they were judged as “outstanding” (33%), “excellent” (44%), “good” (20%) and “poor” (3%).
Conclusions: Graduates from Stanford’s pass-fail graded program compared satisfactorily or superiorly to their peer group in almost all cases.
Bloodgood RA, Short JG, Jackson JM, Martindale JR. A Change to Pass/Fail Grading in the First Two Years at One Medical School Results in Improved Psychological Well-Being. Acad Med. 2009;84(5):655-662.
Follow this link
Methods: At the University of Virginia School of Medicine the grading systems changed from a graded to a pass/fail System between the years of 2006 and 2007. Researchers retrospectively reviewed academic performance in courses for the first two years, USMLE step one and two examinations and residency placement success in 141 students from the class of 2006 and 140 students from the 2007 class. They also performed a survey of the students to determine perceived general well-being.
Results: The mean for the grated academic performance was 87.14 (SD 4.46) and for the mean pass/fail performance was 87.46 (SD 4.47). Clinical clerkship performance was equivalent between the two groups. The mean USMLE scores for step 1 were 222 (±20) for the graded class and 226 (±21) for the pass/fail class. The pass/fail class demonstrated statistically significant increases in psychological well-being.
Conclusions: Changing the system from a graded to pass/fail method improved students’ psychological well-being without sacrificing academic success.
Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, Hojat M. An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using three decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system. Med Educ. 2004 Apr;38(4):425-434.
Follow this link
Methods: A prospective longitudinal study of 6656 medical students at Jefferson Medical College over three decades was performed to see if conversion to a pass/fail system would allow for loss of predictive value. Researchers looked at the academic accomplishments in years 2 and 3 of medical school, class rank, delayed to graduation and attrition, performance on medical licensing examinations, and clinical competence ratings. They placed students into deciles based on measured variables.
Results: The measured variables supported the predictive value of number grades. Clinical performance was significantly predicted by number grades in the early college years.
Conclusions: The authors state their findings call into question abandoning number grades for a pass/fail system. In addition, their results argued that students on the lower edge of passing would be missed due to the less detailed nature of a pass/fail system.
Reed DA, Shanafelt TD, Satele DW, et al. Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well-being among preclinical medical students: a multi-institutional study. Acad Med. Nov;86(11):1367-1373.
Follow this link
Methods: These researchers performed a prospective survey of 2056 first and second year medical students from seven U.S. medical schools in 2007 asking about curriculum structure, grading method, stress, burnout, and quality of life. These last three measures were surveyed using validated scales. Grading scales were categorized by two categories (pass/fail) or three or more categories (a variety of methods).
Results: A total of 1192 students (58%) responded. Using a multivariate analysis, students in programs with three or more grading categories experienced greater stress, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization. They were also more likely to experience burnout and to consider dropping out.
Conclusions: “How students are evaluated has a greater impact than other aspects of curriculum structure on their well-being. Curricular reform intended to enhance student well-being should incorporate pass/fail grading.”

This ezine was made possible through the support of our sponsors:

Grand Sponsor




Major Sponsor