Practice Perfect - A PRESENT Podiatry eZine
Not seeing images? View here | Forward to a Friend  |  Correct image display instructions.
To ensure deliverability, add [email protected] to your eMail 'White List'.
Practice Perfect - PRESENT Podatry

 
Jarrod Shapiro, DPM
Jarrod Shapiro, DPM
Practice Perfect Editor

Assistant Professor,
Dept. of Podiatric Medicine,
Surgery & Biomechanics
College of Podiatric Medicine
Western University of
Health Sciences,
St, Pomona, CA
Do We Want To Accept Medicaid?

Here's a recent news release:

Medicaid Physician Recognition Bill
Introduced in House

HR 3364 (which would recognize podiatrists as physicians under Medicaid), has been introduced in the House of Representatives.  HR 3364 is a companion bill to S 1309, The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians under Medicaid Act.

HR 3364 was introduced today by Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb. Cosponsors include Reps. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., Bill Posey, R-Fla., and Brian Bilbray, R-Calif.

Both bills retain the same title and wording as previous years' bills and would recognize the services of podiatrists as physician services in the Social Security Act's Title XIX/ Medicaid statute. The law currently requires that physician services be covered by state Medicaid programs, but states may opt to cover "podiatry services" or not.”

(Source: APMA News Brief November 7, 2011)


 
Tonight's Premier Lecture is
Diabetic Foot Infections:
Antibiotic Therapies

by Warren Joseph, DPM, FIDSA


Medicade
In California, podiatrists are considered providers of a “voluntary” service (along with dentistry and optometry). I’m not sure what constitutes a “necessary” service, since podiatric medicine has been proven to decrease both the pedal complications and costs related to diabetes. Why wouldn't any insurance company want to improve their patients’ health while decreasing their own costs? It’s beyond me.

I work at a couple of county hospitals, and, in ways I’ll probably never understand, allow us to bill for Medi-Cal (the California version of Medicaid) only if we see the patient in the hospital. Reimbursement amount, of course, is another matter entirely.


Take, for example, another news release:

Feds Approve CA's Plan to Slash Medi-Cal Payments:

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has given the go ahead to California's plan to cut reimbursement rates by 10% for a number of Medi-Cal providers. According to DHCS, CMS has allowed the state to make a 10% cut to:

  • Reimbursements to a number of providers and outpatient services, including clinics, dentists, laboratories, optometrists, and durable medical equipment; and
  • Freestanding nursing and adult subacute care facilities, as well as other nursing facilities.

Officials with California's Department of Health Care Services said the cuts are retroactive to June 1, meaning health care providers will have to return money to the state or have the funds subtracted from upcoming payments.

CMS has not decided whether to approve California's proposals to:

  • Require beneficiaries to pay $5 copayments for physician visits and $50 copays for emergency department visits; and
  • Limit beneficiaries to seven physician visits annually.

The state has withdrawn a request to cut Medi-Cal rates to hospitals and to children's medical providers after concluding that those reductions would hamper access to care."

(Source: California Healthcare October 28, 2011)


Why do we want to be part of a system that pays virtually nothing for a high risk community and continues to drop the reimbursements? I find only one reasonable argument why any podiatric physician would choose to accept Medicaid patients — assuming their state even allows it: the rest of the medical community sees them. When a DO or MD sees patients in the hospital, they’ll see Medicaid patients. It's simply part of the job to see all patients that are assigned, regardless of insurance. If we want parity, we need to behave in the same manner as those with which we want that parity. In your private office, feel free to choose your patients — that's a private office matter.

But if you’re going to take call or accept consultations at your local hospital, you shouldn’t limit the types of patients you’ll see. If you want to be part of your medical community, then you have to participate in the same manner as that community. I have been on staff at hospitals with podiatric physicians who refuse to see either Medicaid or uninsured patients, and this is looked on negatively by the hospital community. The question boils down to this: do you want to avoid Medicaid patients or do you want parity? We can’t have both.

Keep writing in with your thoughts and comments. Better yet, post them in our eTalk forum.
Best wishes.

Jarrod Shapiro, DPM sig
Jarrod Shapiro, DPM
PRESENT Practice Perfect Editor
[email protected]

###


Diabetic Foot Infections: Antibiotic Therapies
Diabetic Foot Infections: Antibiotic Therapies
Amerigel
Diabetic Foot Infections: Antibiotic Therapies



Get a steady stream of all the NEW PRESENT Podiatry
eLearning by becoming our Facebook Fan.
Effective eLearning and a Colleague Network await you.
Facebook Fan page - PRESENT Podiatry


This eZine was made possible through the support of our sponsors:
Grand Sponsor
Stryker
Diamond Sponsor Bako Pathology Services

Major Sponsors
Advanced BioHealing
Merz
KCI
Amerigel
Gill Podiatry
Merck
Integra
Dermpath Diagnostics
ANS
Organogenesis
Pam Lab (Metanx)
Sechrist
GraMedica
Tekscan
Vilex
AllPro Imaging
Kalypto Medical
ACI Medical
Permara
PRO2MED
Koven Technology
Lorenz NeuroVasc
Compulink
Regenesis
Baystone Media
Ascension Orthopedics
MMI
ICS Software
Foothelpers
Miltex
Monarch Labs
Baxter
European Footcare
Diabetes In Control